Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GRGRX vs RMEBX
GRGRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GRGRX vs RMEBX
GRGRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GRGRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRGRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. GRGRX (446M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GRGRX: RMEBX (1.04) vs GRGRX (0.87). GRGRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GRGRX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GRGRX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GRGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GRGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GRGRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). GRGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. GRGRX (20.53).
| GRGRX | RMEBX | GRGRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.07 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.503 | 5.801 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.04 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.75 | 9.98 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.65 | 34.14 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.53 | 32.93 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.08 | 89.84 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement