GRID
Price
$188.15
Change
-$0.57 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
11.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICLN
Price
$20.48
Change
-$0.19 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Net Assets
3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRID vs ICLN

GRID vs ICLN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) vs. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN)

Key Takeaways

  • GRID tracks companies focused on smart grid infrastructure and electrical equipment, while ICLN provides broader exposure to global clean energy producers including solar, wind, and renewable utilities.
  • GRID maintains a higher expense ratio of 0.56% compared to ICLN’s 0.39%, reflecting differences in index complexity and provider structures.
  • GRID concentrates in industrials (approximately 65% of assets) with top holdings such as ABB, ETN, and JCI, emphasizing grid modernization and equipment.
  • ICLN allocates more evenly across technology and utilities, with significant weight in solar and renewable energy firms such as Bloom Energy and First Solar.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed, market-cap weighted vehicles offering thematic exposure without leverage or active stock selection.
  • GRID offers greater diversification within electrical infrastructure themes, whereas ICLN captures a wider spectrum of clean energy generation and equipment providers.

Introduction

GRID and ICLN represent two distinct approaches to clean energy and infrastructure investing. GRID targets smart grid and electrical infrastructure companies, while ICLN focuses on global clean energy generation and equipment. They do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative exposures within the broader clean energy and power transition theme. Investors evaluating these funds often seek to balance infrastructure modernization with renewable generation opportunities amid shifting energy policies and capital allocation trends.

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) Overview

GRID is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. The index includes global companies primarily engaged in electric grid infrastructure, energy storage, management systems, and related equipment. The fund holds approximately 122 to 136 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.56%. Sector allocations are dominated by industrials (around 65%), followed by utilities (approximately 20%) and technology (about 11%). Top holdings typically include ABB, ETN, JCI, Schneider Electric, and National Grid. The strategy employs a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the underlying index.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Overview

ICLN is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. The index comprises global companies involved in clean energy production, equipment manufacturing, and related services. The fund holds approximately 100 to 134 securities and carries an expense ratio of 0.39%. Sector allocations generally feature electronic technology and semiconductors (around 45%), utilities (approximately 32%), and producer manufacturing or industrials (about 21%). Prominent holdings often include Bloom Energy, First Solar, NextEra Energy affiliates, Enphase Energy, and international renewable operators. The fund uses a market-capitalization weighting approach with regular index-driven rebalancing.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The clean energy and power infrastructure sectors operate within a dynamic environment shaped by global decarbonization efforts, grid modernization needs, and evolving regulatory frameworks. Capital flows continue toward renewable generation and transmission upgrades, supported by policy incentives in major markets. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate trajectories, commodity price fluctuations affecting equipment costs, and geopolitical developments influencing supply chains for critical minerals and components. Sector risks encompass policy shifts, technological disruption, and integration challenges for intermittent renewable sources. Both ETFs provide exposure to these themes through equity markets, with performance influenced by earnings growth in infrastructure and clean energy companies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GRID has demonstrated sensitivity to industrial and utility sector rotations, benefiting from sustained demand for electrical equipment and grid enhancements. ICLN has shown greater responsiveness to clean energy generation trends, including solar and wind project developments. Relative positioning highlights GRID’s tilt toward established industrial leaders in grid technology, which may exhibit different volatility patterns compared to ICLN’s exposure to more specialized renewable equipment manufacturers. Both funds have navigated broader interest rate expectations and commodity trends, with performance differentials arising from their distinct holdings and sector weightings rather than short-term price fluctuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to ICLN due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across clean energy sub-sectors, and alignment with prevailing renewable generation momentum. GRID remains a compelling option for investors prioritizing smart grid infrastructure exposure and industrial equipment leadership. The assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of cost efficiency, thematic consistency, and risk-adjusted positioning rather than a definitive recommendation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GRID vs. ICLN commentary
Jun 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRID is a Hold and ICLN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRID has more net assets: 11.6B vs. ICLN (3B). ICLN has a higher annual dividend yield than GRID: ICLN (24.985) vs GRID (23.031). GRID was incepted earlier than ICLN: GRID (17 years) vs ICLN (18 years). ICLN (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than GRID (0.56). GRID (26.00) and ICLN (25.00) have matching turnover.
GRIDICLNGRID / ICLN
Gain YTD23.03124.98592%
Net Assets11.6B3B387%
Total Expense Ratio0.560.39144%
Turnover26.0025.00104%
Yield0.781.1469%
Fund Existence17 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRIDICLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRID
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FJP76.970.27
+0.35%
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF
CRDT23.200.07
+0.30%
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
MEAR50.360.03
+0.06%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
AGIX45.01-0.35
-0.77%
KraneSharesArtfclIntglcandTechPub-PvtETF
CBTJ17.48-0.23
-1.33%
Calamos Bitcoin 80 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan

GRID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRID has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRID jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRID
1D Price
Change %
GRID100%
-0.30%
ETN - GRID
79%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
NVT - GRID
69%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
AEIS - GRID
68%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
PWR - GRID
67%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
JCI - GRID
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More

ICLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICLN
1D Price
Change %
ICLN100%
-0.92%
NXT - ICLN
73%
Closely correlated
-3.29%
BE - ICLN
69%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
FCEL - ICLN
68%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
FSLR - ICLN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
SEDG - ICLN
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.00%
More