GRLGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.03 (-27.27%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
456.02M
GSHRF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
20.85M
Ad is loading...

GRLGF vs GSHRF

Header iconGRLGF vs GSHRF Comparison
Open Charts GRLGF vs GSHRFBanner chart's image
Greatland Gold
Price$0.08
Change-$0.03 (-27.27%)
Volume$524.8K
Capitalization456.02M
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$50.84K
Capitalization20.85M
GRLGF vs GSHRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLGF vs. GSHRF commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLGF is a Hold and GSHRF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLGF: $0.08 vs. GSHRF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: GRLGF and GSHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLGF: 273% vs. GSHRF: 123%
Market capitalization -- GRLGF: $456.02M vs. GSHRF: $20.85M
GRLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $456.02M. GSHRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSHRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSHRF is a better buy in the long-term than GRLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRLGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSHRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the short-term than GSHRF.

Price Growth

GRLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -29.52% price change this week, while GSHRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.25% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLGF($456M) has a higher market cap than GSHRF($20.8M). GSHRF YTD gains are higher at: 13.821 vs. GRLGF (-54.286). GSHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.2M vs. GRLGF (-20.54M). GRLGF has more cash in the bank: 59.8M vs. GSHRF (4M). GSHRF has less debt than GRLGF: GSHRF (345K) vs GRLGF (43.7M). GRLGF (0) and GSHRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRLGFGSHRFGRLGF / GSHRF
Capitalization456M20.8M2,192%
EBITDA-20.54M-2.2M931%
Gain YTD-54.28613.821-393%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash59.8M4M1,495%
Total Debt43.7M345K12,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSHRF: Fundamental Ratings
GSHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRLGFGSHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSVO21.620.39
+1.84%
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
NUMV35.020.42
+1.21%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
HFND21.530.15
+0.72%
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strgy Ret Trckr ETF
FGDL35.890.14
+0.39%
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
CADAUD1.12N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Australian Dollar

GRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLGF and EQTRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLGF and EQTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLGF
1D Price
Change %
GRLGF100%
-29.52%
EQTRF - GRLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEXGF - GRLGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSLVF - GRLGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSHRF - GRLGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPMF - GRLGF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
More

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and SSVFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and SSVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
N/A
SSVFF - GSHRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.79%
CHPGF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
DTARF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+12.85%
More