GRLGF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.78B
MFGCF
Price
$1.24
Change
+$0.02 (+1.64%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
134.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLGF vs MFGCF

Header iconGRLGF vs MFGCF Comparison
Open Charts GRLGF vs MFGCFBanner chart's image
Greatland Gold
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$118.08K
Capitalization2.78B
Mayfair Gold
Price$1.24
Change+$0.02 (+1.64%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization134.03M
GRLGF vs MFGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLGF vs. MFGCF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLGF is a StrongBuy and MFGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLGF: $0.22 vs. MFGCF: $1.24)
Brand notoriety: GRLGF and MFGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLGF: 100% vs. MFGCF: 88%
Market capitalization -- GRLGF: $2.78B vs. MFGCF: $134.03M
GRLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.78B. MFGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $134.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the long-term than MFGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRLGF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRLGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MFGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFGCF is a better buy in the short-term than GRLGF.

Price Growth

GRLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MFGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4166.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRLGF($2.78B) has a higher market cap than MFGCF($134M). GRLGF YTD gains are higher at: 28.571 vs. MFGCF (-3.516). GRLGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -10.79M vs. MFGCF (-12.87M). GRLGF has more cash in the bank: 71.9M vs. MFGCF (7.69M). GRLGF has higher revenues than MFGCF: GRLGF (8.29M) vs MFGCF (0).
GRLGFMFGCFGRLGF / MFGCF
Capitalization2.78B134M2,074%
EBITDA-10.79M-12.87M84%
Gain YTD28.571-3.516-813%
P/E Ratio419.31N/A-
Revenue8.29M0-
Total Cash71.9M7.69M936%
Total Debt7.74MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRLGFMFGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNLYF63.492.80
+4.62%
Unilever, PLC
PAFRF0.61N/A
N/A
Pan African Resources PLC
RATIY45.18N/A
N/A
Rational AG
NWCBF0.07N/A
N/A
NEW WORLD COBALT LTD.
STRPF0.24-0.01
-3.91%
Starr Peak Mining Ltd.

GRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLGF and EQTRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLGF and EQTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLGF
1D Price
Change %
GRLGF100%
N/A
EQTRF - GRLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
ODV - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
NFGC - GRLGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
GSHRF - GRLGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
More

MFGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFGCF and TGLDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFGCF and TGLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGCF
1D Price
Change %
MFGCF100%
+1.23%
TGLDF - MFGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUX - MFGCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
KLGDF - MFGCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+11.41%
GRLGF - MFGCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRNLF - MFGCF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A