GRLGF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
456.02M
NFGC
Price
$1.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
696.88M
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRLGF vs NFGC

Header iconGRLGF vs NFGC Comparison
Open Charts GRLGF vs NFGCBanner chart's image
Greatland Gold
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$118.08K
Capitalization456.02M
New Found Gold
Price$1.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.7K
Capitalization696.88M
GRLGF vs NFGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRLGF vs. NFGC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRLGF is a Hold and NFGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GRLGF: $0.22 vs. NFGC: $1.43)
Brand notoriety: GRLGF and NFGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRLGF: 126% vs. NFGC: 1%
Market capitalization -- GRLGF: $456.02M vs. NFGC: $696.88M
GRLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $456.02M. NFGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $696.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRLGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNFGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRLGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NFGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRLGF is a better buy in the long-term than NFGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRLGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRLGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NFGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NFGC is a better buy in the short-term than GRLGF.

Price Growth

GRLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NFGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFGC is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFGC($697M) has a higher market cap than GRLGF($456M). GRLGF YTD gains are higher at: 28.571 vs. NFGC (-21.429). GRLGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -20.54M vs. NFGC (-78.92M). GRLGF (59.8M) and NFGC (57.3M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NFGC has less debt than GRLGF: NFGC (158K) vs GRLGF (43.7M). GRLGF (0) and NFGC (0) have equivalent revenues.
GRLGFNFGCGRLGF / NFGC
Capitalization456M697M65%
EBITDA-20.54M-78.92M26%
Gain YTD28.571-21.429-133%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash59.8M57.3M104%
Total Debt43.7M158K27,658%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRLGFNFGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBPIX16.580.18
+1.10%
ProFunds UltraLatin America Inv
HRCVX21.490.12
+0.56%
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income A
JBAWX30.290.11
+0.36%
JHancock Balanced R6
FEVIX23.450.05
+0.21%
First Eagle US I
EPDPX11.67-0.01
-0.09%
EuroPac International Dividend Income A

GRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRLGF and EQTRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRLGF and EQTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRLGF
1D Price
Change %
GRLGF100%
N/A
EQTRF - GRLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
MEXGF - GRLGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+22.79%
IAUX - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
ODV - GRLGF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
NFGC - GRLGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFGC has been loosely correlated with AYASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFGC jumps, then AYASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFGC
1D Price
Change %
NFGC100%
N/A
AYASF - NFGC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
TORXF - NFGC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
KNTNF - NFGC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
GLGDF - NFGC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
ISVLF - NFGC
51%
Loosely correlated
+6.50%
More