GRO
Price
$2.21
Change
-$0.06 (-2.64%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
135.46M
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSM
Price
$3.30
Change
+$0.03 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
616.64M
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRO vs GSM

GRO vs GSM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRO vs. GSM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRO is a Buy and GSM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (GRO: $2.21 vs. GSM: $3.30)
Brand notoriety: GRO and GSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRO: 44% vs. GSM: 72%
Market capitalization -- GRO: $135.46M vs. GSM: $616.64M
GRO [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $135.46M. GSM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $616.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRO is a better buy in the long-term than GSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GSM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRO is a better buy in the short-term than GSM.

Price Growth

GRO (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.45% price change this week, while GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

GSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-7.68% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSM($617M) has a higher market cap than GRO($135M). GRO YTD gains are higher at: 16.931 vs. GSM (-28.318). GSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -17.2M vs. GRO (-48.85M). GRO has less debt than GSM: GRO (512K) vs GSM (240M). GSM has higher revenues than GRO: GSM (1.38B) vs GRO (0).
GROGSMGRO / GSM
Capitalization135M617M22%
EBITDA-48.85M-17.2M284%
Gain YTD16.931-28.318-60%
P/E RatioN/A6.34-
Revenue01.38B-
Total Cash22.5MN/A-
Total Debt512K240M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSM: Fundamental Ratings
GSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GROGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MISEX47.40N/A
N/A
Midas Special Opportunities
PCCGX12.23N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value C
PRGTX35.84N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
RIFYX42.93N/A
N/A
Victory RS Science and Technology Y
TSNAX18.87N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth A

GRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRO and LAC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRO and LAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRO
1D Price
Change %
GRO100%
-2.64%
LAC - GRO
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.42%
WRN - GRO
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
USAR - GRO
31%
Poorly correlated
-6.87%
NB - GRO
31%
Poorly correlated
-6.93%
GSM - GRO
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More