GROW
Price
$2.54
Change
+$0.03 (+1.20%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
33.18M
OWL
Price
$19.09
Change
+$0.54 (+2.91%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.43B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GROW vs OWL

Header iconGROW vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts GROW vs OWLBanner chart's image
US Global Investors
Price$2.54
Change+$0.03 (+1.20%)
Volume$361
Capitalization33.18M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$19.09
Change+$0.54 (+2.91%)
Volume$60.19K
Capitalization12.43B
GROW vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GROW vs. OWL commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GROW is a Hold and OWL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GROW: $2.56 vs. OWL: $19.09)
Brand notoriety: GROW and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GROW: 302% vs. OWL: 98%
Market capitalization -- GROW: $33.18M vs. OWL: $12.43B
GROW [@Investment Managers] is valued at $33.18M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $176.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GROW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GROW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GROW and OWL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GROW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GROW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GROW and OWL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GROW (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.67% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.30% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($12.4B) has a higher market cap than GROW($33.2M). GROW has higher P/E ratio than OWL: GROW (253.00) vs OWL (173.55). GROW YTD gains are higher at: 8.003 vs. OWL (-15.419). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. GROW (612K). GROW has less debt than OWL: GROW (17K) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than GROW: OWL (2.62B) vs GROW (8.93M).
GROWOWLGROW / OWL
Capitalization33.2M12.4B0%
EBITDA612K804M0%
Gain YTD8.003-15.419-52%
P/E Ratio253.00173.55146%
Revenue8.93M2.62B0%
Total CashN/A118M-
Total Debt17K3.65B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GROW: Fundamental Ratings
GROW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GROWOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LITM3.920.16
+4.26%
Snow Lake Resources Ltd
CHMG53.501.00
+1.90%
Chemung Financial Corp
LEA107.351.47
+1.39%
Lear Corp
LMB102.89-0.76
-0.73%
Limbach Holdings
BMY45.60-0.55
-1.19%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+2.91%
ARES - OWL
87%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
KKR - OWL
86%
Closely correlated
+3.42%
APO - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+3.36%
CG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
TPG - OWL
84%
Closely correlated
+1.77%
More