GROW
Price
$2.13
Change
+$0.02 (+0.95%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
45.03M
OWL
Price
$17.41
Change
+$0.31 (+1.81%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GROW vs OWL

Header iconGROW vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts GROW vs OWLBanner chart's image
US Global Investors
Price$2.13
Change+$0.02 (+0.95%)
Volume$24.35K
Capitalization45.03M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$17.41
Change+$0.31 (+1.81%)
Volume$6.64M
Capitalization8.65B
GROW vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
GROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GROW vs. OWL commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GROW is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (GROW: $2.13 vs. OWL: $17.41)
Brand notoriety: GROW and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GROW: 87% vs. OWL: 74%
Market capitalization -- GROW: $45.03M vs. OWL: $8.65B
GROW [@Investment Managers] is valued at $45.03M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GROW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GROW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GROW is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GROW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GROW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GROW is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

GROW (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.28% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

GROW is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.92% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($8.65B) has a higher market cap than GROW($45M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than GROW: OWL (185.70) vs GROW (12.09). GROW YTD gains are higher at: -11.555 vs. OWL (-24.588). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 633M vs. GROW (4.48M). OWL has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. GROW (37.6M). GROW has less debt than OWL: GROW (54K) vs OWL (2B). OWL has higher revenues than GROW: OWL (1.73B) vs GROW (12.9M).
GROWOWLGROW / OWL
Capitalization45M8.65B1%
EBITDA4.48M633M1%
Gain YTD-11.555-24.58847%
P/E Ratio12.09185.707%
Revenue12.9M1.73B1%
Total Cash37.6M104M36%
Total Debt54K2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GROW: Fundamental Ratings
GROW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GROWOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDGT71.300.87
+1.24%
iShares U.S. Digital Infras & RE ETF
SCHV24.990.28
+1.13%
Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF™
HDG47.490.22
+0.47%
ProShares Hedge Replication
EOT16.070.02
+0.12%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST
VTES99.680.02
+0.02%
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exmpt Bd ETF

GROW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GROW has been loosely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GROW jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GROW
1D Price
Change %
GROW100%
+0.95%
CRBG - GROW
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
HTGC - GROW
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
KKR - GROW
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
OWL - GROW
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
TPG - GROW
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+1.81%
ARES - OWL
83%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
KKR - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
APO - OWL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
CG - OWL
77%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
BX - OWL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
More