GRRLF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.05 (-35.71%)
Updated
Mar 21 closing price
Capitalization
145.57M
LLLAF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.03 (+42.86%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
909.73M
Ad is loading...

GRRLF vs LLLAF

Header iconGRRLF vs LLLAF Comparison
Open Charts GRRLF vs LLLAFBanner chart's image
Grange Resources
Price$0.09
Change-$0.05 (-35.71%)
Volume$10.45K
Capitalization145.57M
LEO LITHIUM
Price$0.10
Change+$0.03 (+42.86%)
Volume$720
Capitalization909.73M
GRRLF vs LLLAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRRLF vs. LLLAF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRRLF is a Hold and LLLAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GRRLF: $0.09 vs. LLLAF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: GRRLF and LLLAF are both not notable
GRRLF represents the Steel, while LLLAF is part of the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRRLF: 71% vs. LLLAF: 2%
Market capitalization -- GRRLF: $145.57M vs. LLLAF: $909.73M
GRRLF [@Steel] is valued at $145.57M. LLLAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $909.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $25.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5B. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRRLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLLLAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GRRLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LLLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LLLAF is a better buy in the long-term than GRRLF.

Price Growth

GRRLF (@Steel) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LLLAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -4.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.01%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-4.62% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

@Other Metals/Minerals (-2.74% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LLLAF($910M) has a higher market cap than GRRLF($146M). LLLAF has higher P/E ratio than GRRLF: LLLAF (7.79) vs GRRLF (2.84). LLLAF YTD gains are higher at: -8.571 vs. GRRLF (-39.813).
GRRLFLLLAFGRRLF / LLLAF
Capitalization146M910M16%
EBITDA211MN/A-
Gain YTD-39.813-8.571464%
P/E Ratio2.847.7936%
Revenue570MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRRLF: Fundamental Ratings
GRRLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFNNX67.710.80
+1.20%
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences N
MAGCX26.280.10
+0.38%
BlackRock Advantage Global Institutional
ASCQX15.01N/A
N/A
American Century Small Company I
NUIAX29.07N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Dividend Growth A
THOGX39.13-0.01
-0.03%
Thornburg Global Opportunities R6

GRRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRRLF and PWMCF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRRLF and PWMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRRLF
1D Price
Change %
GRRLF100%
N/A
PWMCF - GRRLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFBOF - GRRLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.57%
MTRN - GRRLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
LLLAF - GRRLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEMIF - GRRLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.91%
More

LLLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLLAF has been loosely correlated with AUSDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLLAF jumps, then AUSDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLLAF
1D Price
Change %
LLLAF100%
N/A
AUSDF - LLLAF
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WHYRF - LLLAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGIFF - LLLAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGXFF - LLLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRRLF - LLLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More