Advertisement
GS vs IBKR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Interactive Brokers (IBKR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Goldman Sachs (GS) operates as a leading investment bank with exposure to capital markets and wealth management, while Interactive Brokers (IBKR) focuses on a technology-driven brokerage platform serving global retail and institutional clients.
- In recent market activity, GS shares have faced downward pressure amid broader sector volatility, with one-month returns showing declines of approximately 7-17%.
- IBKR has demonstrated stronger relative momentum, posting year-to-date gains near 41% and maintaining stability in the most recent trading sessions.
- Valuation metrics show GS trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio compared to IBKR, reflecting differences in growth profiles and business models.
- Sector sentiment has been influenced by macroeconomic factors, with both stocks exhibiting sensitivity to interest rate expectations and trading volumes.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs between GS's established franchise in advisory and underwriting versus IBKR's scalable, low-cost trading infrastructure.
Introduction
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) represent distinct segments within the capital markets industry, offering investors contrasting exposure to traditional investment banking and modern brokerage services. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and positioning in the current environment. Institutional investors, active traders, and those seeking diversification within financials may find the analysis relevant for evaluating relative strengths in momentum, valuation, and operational focus. The review draws on observable market data and developments from recent weeks to provide a balanced perspective on how these stocks have responded to prevailing conditions.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is a global investment bank and financial services firm engaged in investment banking, markets, asset and wealth management, and consumer banking. In recent market activity, GS shares have experienced notable volatility and downward pressure, declining from levels above $1,000 in early September 2026 to approximately $942 by mid-to-late September. One-month performance has reflected losses in the 7-17% range amid broader market fluctuations. Key influences on sentiment include macroeconomic uncertainty and sector-wide reactions to economic indicators. The stock maintains a substantial market capitalization near $274 billion and continues to benefit from its established franchise in advisory and capital markets activities.
IBKR Overview and Recent Performance
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) operates a global electronic brokerage platform offering low-cost trading across equities, options, futures, and other asset classes to retail and institutional clients worldwide. In recent market activity, IBKR shares have shown relative resilience, closing near $90.69 on September 18, 2026, with modest gains in several sessions. Year-to-date performance remains strong at approximately 41%, supported by consistent client growth and trading volume trends. The company maintains a market capitalization around $41 billion. Sentiment has been shaped by its technology-driven efficiency and expansion in international markets, positioning it as a beneficiary of increased electronic trading activity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the strongest and most suitable bots for current environments earn placement in this section, with available bots demonstrating ranges of returns, win rates, and drawdown statistics that reflect diverse risk-reward characteristics. All AI trading bots feature distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to explore options aligned with individual objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Interactive Brokers (IBKR) differ fundamentally in business model: GS derives significant revenue from investment banking fees, trading, and wealth management, exposing it to cyclical deal flow and market-making activities, whereas IBKR generates income primarily through commissions and interest on margin balances via a scalable, automated platform. Recent momentum favors IBKR, which has delivered stronger year-to-date gains amid sustained trading volumes, while GS has encountered more pronounced short-term declines. Risk factors include GS's sensitivity to economic cycles and regulatory developments versus IBKR's reliance on retail participation and interest rate environments. Sector exposure overlaps in capital markets, yet IBKR offers greater international reach and technology emphasis. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with valuation multiples showing GS at a lower price-to-earnings ratio, highlighting a trade-off between established scale and growth-oriented efficiency.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability in recent sessions, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Interactive Brokers (IBKR). The stock's sustained year-to-date performance and resilience amid volatility suggest stronger alignment with current market dynamics compared to GS's recent pullback. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to prevailing data rather than guarantees of future outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a StrongBuy and IBKR is a Hold.
GS | IBKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GS's Valuation (71) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IBKR (93). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (18). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBKR (45). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBKR’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (58). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
IBKR's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (64). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | IBKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 62% | 12 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 62% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while IBKR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- IBKR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBKR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IBKR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.52% price change this week, while IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
IBKR is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.83% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
IBKR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IBKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBKR | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| HOOD - IBKR | 68% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| RJF - IBKR | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| MS - IBKR | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| GS - IBKR | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| GLXY - IBKR | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||