GS
Price
$625.94
Change
+$12.95 (+2.11%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
134.2B
86 days until earnings call
LAZ
Price
$51.15
Change
+$1.46 (+2.94%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.66B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GS vs LAZ

Header iconGS vs LAZ Comparison
Open Charts GS vs LAZBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$625.94
Change+$12.95 (+2.11%)
Volume$3.43M
Capitalization134.2B
Lazard
Price$51.15
Change+$1.46 (+2.94%)
Volume$890.8K
Capitalization3.66B
GS vs LAZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. LAZ commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and LAZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $625.94 vs. LAZ: $51.15)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. LAZ: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 163% vs. LAZ: 108%
Market capitalization -- GS: $134.2B vs. LAZ: $3.66B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $134.2B. LAZ’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLAZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than LAZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LAZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +11.78% price change this week, while LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +8.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than LAZ($3.66B). GS has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: GS (18.08) vs LAZ (16.44). GS YTD gains are higher at: 9.312 vs. LAZ (-0.641). LAZ has less debt than GS: LAZ (2.18B) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than LAZ: GS (46.3B) vs LAZ (2.55B).
GSLAZGS / LAZ
Capitalization134B3.66B3,660%
EBITDAN/A40.9M-
Gain YTD9.312-0.641-1,453%
P/E Ratio18.0816.44110%
Revenue46.3B2.55B1,815%
Total CashN/A1.19B-
Total Debt333B2.18B15,310%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs LAZ: Fundamental Ratings
GS
LAZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2466
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
530
SMR RATING
1..100
520
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6691
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAZ's Valuation (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (96). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (30). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (20). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAZ (50). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (91). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSLAZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWAX25.360.30
+1.20%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq A
CRQSX13.010.15
+1.17%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invst Equity Idx Ins
ISMOX4.250.04
+0.95%
Voya MidCap Opportunities Port S
IENRX9.640.08
+0.84%
Macquarie Climate Solutions R6
RWEBX62.570.49
+0.79%
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E