GS
Price
$625.94
Change
+$12.95 (+2.11%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
134.2B
86 days until earnings call
MC
Price
$77.34
Change
+$0.77 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GS vs MC

Header iconGS vs MC Comparison
Open Charts GS vs MCBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$625.94
Change+$12.95 (+2.11%)
Volume$3.43M
Capitalization134.2B
Moelis & Company
Price$77.34
Change+$0.77 (+1.01%)
Volume$523.42K
Capitalization3.79B
GS vs MC Comparison Chart
Loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. MC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and MC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GS: $625.94 vs. MC: $77.34)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. MC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 167% vs. MC: 87%
Market capitalization -- GS: $134.2B vs. MC: $3.79B
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $134.2B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GS and MC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +11.78% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +8.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +18.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2025.

MC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+18.48% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($134B) has a higher market cap than MC($3.79B). MC has higher P/E ratio than GS: MC (82.58) vs GS (18.08). GS YTD gains are higher at: 9.312 vs. MC (4.683). MC has less debt than GS: MC (216M) vs GS (333B). GS has higher revenues than MC: GS (46.3B) vs MC (855M).
GSMCGS / MC
Capitalization134B3.79B3,540%
EBITDAN/A-32.04M-
Gain YTD9.3124.683199%
P/E Ratio18.0882.5822%
Revenue46.3B855M5,415%
Total CashN/A186M-
Total Debt333B216M154,167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
GS
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
518
SMR RATING
1..100
565
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (96). This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (18). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MC (65). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (42). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (97). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSFRX37.870.42
+1.12%
Domini Impact Equity Y
CLBEX34.900.21
+0.61%
American Funds American Balanced 529E
LRSOX21.660.13
+0.60%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F3
TRWCX20.180.10
+0.50%
Transamerica International Equity C
DPREX12.070.03
+0.25%
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets A