Advertisement
GS vs MC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Goldman Sachs (GS) vs. Moelis & Company (MC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GS boasts a market capitalization of approximately $275 billion, dwarfing MC's $5.1 billion, reflecting greater scale and diversification.
- GS trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 16.92 compared to MC's 23.70, suggesting relatively better value in recent market activity.
- Year-to-date, GS has gained about 6%, outperforming MC's 2.4% return, amid broader financial sector volatility.
- MC offers a higher dividend yield of 3.73% versus GS's 1.94%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Over the past year, GS delivered returns around 69%, significantly ahead of MC's 30%.
- MC showed stronger one-month momentum at nearly 23% gain versus GS's 8%, driven by earnings beats.
Introduction
Goldman Sachs (GS) and Moelis & Company (MC) represent distinct players in the investment banking landscape, with GS as a global powerhouse and MC as a boutique advisory firm. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and sector dynamics, aiding traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors evaluating financial sector exposure. In a market influenced by interest rate shifts and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, understanding their relative strengths helps inform portfolio decisions amid evolving economic conditions.
GS Overview and Recent Performance
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) is a leading global investment bank offering services in investment banking, securities, asset management, and consumer banking. With a market cap exceeding $275 billion, it benefits from diversified revenue streams including trading and wealth management. In recent weeks, GS shares have exhibited resilience, trading around $927 with a year-to-date gain of nearly 6% and a one-month rise of about 8%. Sentiment has been supported by strong analyst coverage, with an average price target of $935, amid broader market optimism on banking sector recovery and AI-driven insights into tech stocks. Volatility remains moderate with a beta of 1.31, influenced by macroeconomic factors like interest rates and geopolitical events.
MC Overview and Recent Performance
Moelis & Company (MC) specializes in independent advisory services, focusing on M&A, restructuring, and capital markets across industries. Its smaller $5.1 billion market cap allows agility in niche deals. Recent market activity saw MC shares surge nearly 23% over the past month to around $70, following a Q4 earnings beat with revenue of $488 million exceeding estimates. Year-to-date performance stands at 2.4%, with higher beta of 1.86 reflecting sensitivity to deal flow fluctuations. Analyst targets average $69, tempered by recent price target cuts from firms like Goldman Sachs, amid mixed M&A sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform’s top-performing AI trading bots amid current market conditions. With over 350 AI bots trading thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto, only about 25 earn a spot in this trending section based on real-time signals, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability. These bots employ diverse strategies—from short-term scalping on 5-minute charts to longer-term trend following—featuring win rates often above 60%, profit factors ranging from 1.5 to 3.0, and thousands of historical trades. Signal Agents require no minimum balance, while Virtual and Brokerage Agents incorporate advanced risk management. Traders can explore these tools to enhance strategies on tickers like GS and MC; visit the page for live performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GS’s diversified business model spans global trading and asset management (AUM, assets under management), contrasting MC’s advisory focus vulnerable to M&A cycles. Growth drivers for GS include institutional securities and consumer banking expansion, while MC relies on deal volume amid economic uncertainty. Recent momentum favors MC short-term but GS longer-term, with lower beta signaling stability. Risk factors: GS exposed to market volatility (NII, net interest income swings), MC to fee variability. Both operate in financials, but GS’s scale bolsters resilience; sentiment leans positive for GS via outperform ratings versus MC’s holds.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors GS due to superior trend consistency, lower valuation multiples, and stronger year-to-date relative performance positioning it ahead in risk-adjusted terms. While MC shows short-term momentum from earnings catalysts, GS’s scale and diversification suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance in prevailing conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and MC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.21% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.
MC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.51% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
| GS | MC | GS / MC | |
| Capitalization | 306B | 5.13B | 5,968% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 290M | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.962 | 2.296 | 826% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.92 | 24.79 | 76% |
| Revenue | 60.4B | 1.53B | 3,948% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 153M | - |
| Total Debt | 435B | 267M | 162,921% |
GS | MC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MC's Valuation (11) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for GS (82). This means that MC’s stock grew significantly faster than GS’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MC (53). This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.
GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (21). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.
GS's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (42). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.
GS's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (59). This means that GS’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.
| GS | MC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
MC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.