Ad is loading...
GSBCX vs HBLAX
GSBCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts GSBCX vs HBLAX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder C
Price$24.40
Change+$0.21 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.46B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.21
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
GSBCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBCX is a StrongBuy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. GSBCX (2.46B). GSBCX (3.47) and HBLAX (3.37) have matching dividends . GSBCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: GSBCX (28 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). GSBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GSBCX (30.00). GSBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: GSBCX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to GSBCX: HBLAX (2000) vs GSBCX (250). GSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. HBLAX (3.15). GSBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.72 vs. HBLAX (16.27).
| GSBCX | HBLAX | GSBCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.89 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.997 | 0.242 | -412% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 11.5B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 3.37 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 3.15 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.46 | 4.50 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.72 | 16.27 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.61 | 29.43 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...