Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBCX vs HBLAX
GSBCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts GSBCX vs HBLAX
GSBCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBCX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. GSBCX (2.79B). GSBCX (3.23) and HBLAX (3.13) have matching dividends . GSBCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: GSBCX (29 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). GSBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. GSBCX (33.00). GSBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: GSBCX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to GSBCX: HBLAX (2000) vs GSBCX (250). GSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. HBLAX (1.22). GSBCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.83 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| GSBCX | HBLAX | GSBCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.89 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.89 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | 4.076 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 2.79B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 3.13 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 1.22 | 503% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.86 | 19.75 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.83 | 4.63 | 450% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.38 | 39.00 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement