Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBCX vs HBLAX
GSBCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts GSBCX vs HBLAX
GSBCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBCX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. GSBCX (2.77B). GSBCX (3.28) and HBLAX (3.19) have matching dividends . GSBCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: GSBCX (29 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). GSBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. GSBCX (33.00). GSBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: GSBCX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to GSBCX: HBLAX (2000) vs GSBCX (250). GSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. HBLAX (5.93). GSBCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.98 vs. HBLAX (6.67).
| GSBCX | HBLAX | GSBCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.89 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.89 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.270 | 3.670 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 11.2B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.28 | 3.19 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 5.93 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.46 | 20.36 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.98 | 6.67 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.86 | 42.52 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers