Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBCX vs HBLRX
GSBCX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts GSBCX vs HBLRX
GSBCX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBCX vs. HBLRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBCX is a Hold and HBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. GSBCX (2.79B). GSBCX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: GSBCX (3.23) vs HBLRX (2.74). GSBCX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: GSBCX (29 years) vs HBLRX (16 years). GSBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.27). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. GSBCX (33.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSBCX: HBLRX (0) vs GSBCX (1000). GSBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. HBLRX (0.88). GSBCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.83 vs. HBLRX (2.74).
| GSBCX | HBLRX | GSBCX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.27 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.27 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.965 | 3.850 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.79B | 10.9B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 2.74 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 0.88 | 696% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.86 | 18.49 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.83 | 2.74 | 760% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.38 | 34.74 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement