GSBD
Price
$9.62
Change
+$0.04 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.08B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSDL
Price
$14.71
Change
+$0.07 (+0.48%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSBD vs MSDL

GSBD vs MSDL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. MSDL commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a Hold and MSDL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSDL($1.24B) has a higher market cap than GSBD($1.08B). MSDL has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: MSDL (21.32) vs GSBD (18.50). GSBD YTD gains are higher at: 11.819 vs. MSDL (-5.068). MSDL has more cash in the bank: 76.8M vs. GSBD (41.9M). GSBD has less debt than MSDL: GSBD (1.85B) vs MSDL (1.98B). MSDL (72.4M) and GSBD (71M) have equivalent revenues.
GSBDMSDLGSBD / MSDL
Capitalization1.08B1.24B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.819-5.068-233%
P/E Ratio18.5021.3287%
Revenue71M72.4M98%
Total Cash41.9M76.8M55%
Total Debt1.85B1.98B93%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDMSDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (GSBD: $9.62 vs. MSDL: $14.71)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and MSDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 47% vs. MSDL: 64%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.08B vs. MSDL: $1.24B
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.08B. MSDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $57 to $167.2B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MSDL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSDL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the long-term than MSDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSDL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSDL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the short-term than MSDL.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while MSDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

MSDL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.01% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
GSBD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADNCX21.570.15
+0.70%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov C
DGEZX14.640.07
+0.48%
Destinations Equity Income Z
CWIAX81.950.03
+0.04%
American Funds Cptl Wld Gr&Inc 529-A
OBMCX67.37N/A
N/A
Oberweis Micro-Cap
HQIFX21.87N/A
N/A
Hartford Equity Income F

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with NCDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then NCDL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
+0.42%
NCDL - GSBD
70%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
CGBD - GSBD
69%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
BXSL - GSBD
67%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
OBDC - GSBD
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
MSDL - GSBD
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
More

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been closely correlated with NCDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then NCDL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
+0.48%
NCDL - MSDL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
BXSL - MSDL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
OBDC - MSDL
75%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
CGBD - MSDL
72%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
KBDC - MSDL
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
More