GSBD
Price
$11.44
Change
-$0.05 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
60 days until earnings call
NCDL
Price
$15.96
Change
-$0.05 (-0.31%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
788.22M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSBD vs NCDL

Header iconGSBD vs NCDL Comparison
Open Charts GSBD vs NCDLBanner chart's image
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$11.44
Change-$0.05 (-0.44%)
Volume$593.82K
Capitalization1.31B
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
Price$15.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.31%)
Volume$87.44K
Capitalization788.22M
GSBD vs NCDL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSBD vs. NCDL commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBD is a Buy and NCDL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GSBD: $11.44 vs. NCDL: $15.96)
Brand notoriety: GSBD and NCDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSBD: 94% vs. NCDL: 67%
Market capitalization -- GSBD: $1.31B vs. NCDL: $788.22M
GSBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.31B. NCDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $788.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNCDL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NCDL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the long-term than NCDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCDL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NCDL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the short-term than NCDL.

Price Growth

GSBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NCDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

NCDL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.31B) has a higher market cap than NCDL($788M). GSBD (9.15) and NCDL (8.72) have similar P/E ratio . GSBD YTD gains are higher at: 3.411 vs. NCDL (0.989). GSBD has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. NCDL (1.93M). NCDL has less debt than GSBD: NCDL (1.12B) vs GSBD (1.87B). GSBD has higher revenues than NCDL: GSBD (161M) vs NCDL (98.2M).
GSBDNCDLGSBD / NCDL
Capitalization1.31B788M166%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.4110.989345%
P/E Ratio9.158.72105%
Revenue161M98.2M164%
Total Cash82.8M1.93M4,288%
Total Debt1.87B1.12B168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSBDNCDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NCDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVAIX6.45N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div IS
FZAOX35.60N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
SGAPX24.00N/A
N/A
Virtus SGA Global Growth I
CTIGX16.77N/A
N/A
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth I
PGILX38.92-0.24
-0.61%
Putnam Focused Equity Y

NCDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCDL has been closely correlated with CGBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCDL jumps, then CGBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCDL
1D Price
Change %
NCDL100%
-0.31%
CGBD - NCDL
68%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
GSBD - NCDL
68%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
GLAD - NCDL
66%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
OBDC - NCDL
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
MAIN - NCDL
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More