Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBFX vs HBLAX
GSBFX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts GSBFX vs HBLAX
GSBFX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBFX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBFX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GSBFX (2.78B). GSBFX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: GSBFX (3.86) vs HBLAX (3.13). GSBFX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: GSBFX (32 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). GSBFX (0.94) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. GSBFX (33.00). GSBFX (6%) and HBLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. GSBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: GSBFX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to GSBFX: HBLAX (2000) vs GSBFX (250). GSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.58 vs. HBLAX (1.27). GSBFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.15 vs. HBLAX (4.44).
| GSBFX | HBLAX | GSBFX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.89 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.89 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.060 | 3.517 | 172% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 10.8B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.86 | 3.13 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.58 | 1.27 | 517% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 18.94 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.15 | 4.44 | 567% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.46 | 37.86 | 220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers