Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSBUX vs HBLAX
GSBUX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts GSBUX vs HBLAX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder R6
Price$26.35
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.53
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
GSBUX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSBUX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSBUX is a Buy and HBLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. GSBUX (2.53B). GSBUX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: GSBUX (4.39) vs HBLAX (3.37). GSBUX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: GSBUX (10 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GSBUX (0.62). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GSBUX (30.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSBUX: HBLAX (2000) vs GSBUX (5000000). GSBUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.95 vs. HBLAX (3.59). GSBUX return over 5 years is better than : 32.89 vs. HBLAX (12.06).
| GSBUX | HBLAX | GSBUX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.89 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.89 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.351 | 3.230 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2000 | 250,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 11.7B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.39 | 3.37 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.95 | 3.59 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.84 | 7.47 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.89 | 12.06 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement