Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCGX vs RWMFX
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSCGX vs RWMFX
GSCGX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCGX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCGX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. GSCGX (1.58B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSCGX: RWMFX (1.44) vs GSCGX (0.03). GSCGX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSCGX (36 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSCGX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSCGX: RWMFX (250) vs GSCGX (1000). GSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. RWMFX (5.76). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. GSCGX (14.81).
| GSCGX | RWMFX | GSCGX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.31 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.31 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.724 | 3.858 | 304% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 219B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.44 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.07 | 5.76 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.57 | 29.17 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.81 | 28.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.94 | 77.65 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers