Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCKX vs HFQRX
GSCKX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts GSCKX vs HFQRX
GSCKX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCKX vs. HFQRX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCKX is a Hold and HFQRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.98B vs. GSCKX (3.65B). HFQRX pays higher dividends than GSCKX: HFQRX (6.08) vs GSCKX (1.58). GSCKX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: GSCKX (19 years) vs HFQRX (11 years). GSCKX (1.95) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.69). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. GSCKX (49.00). GSCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: GSCKX (1000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.86 vs. GSCKX (19.73). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 82.48 vs. GSCKX (76.33).
| GSCKX | HFQRX | GSCKX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.69 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.440 | 18.094 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 7.98B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 6.08 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 24.86 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.72 | 73.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.33 | 82.48 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.48 | 135.30 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement