Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
Price$32.84
Change-$0.32 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. GSCLX (1.6B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSCLX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSCLX (0.00). GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSCLX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GSCLX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. GSCLX (3.21). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. GSCLX (-16.17).
| GSCLX | RGACX | GSCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.94 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.789 | 14.863 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 6.60 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.00 | 60.28 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.17 | 30.90 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.08 | 84.84 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement