Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
Price$31.96
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GSCLX (1.56B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSCLX: RGACX (0.07) vs GSCLX (0.00). GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSCLX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GSCLX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. GSCLX (6.43). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. GSCLX (-15.24).
| GSCLX | RGACX | GSCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.94 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.707 | 14.044 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 14.08 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.55 | 41.19 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.24 | 41.95 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.50 | 83.68 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement