Ad is loading...
GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGACX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
Price$26.93
Change+$0.24 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.16
Change+$0.52 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. GSCLX (1.36B). RGACX pays higher dividends than GSCLX: RGACX (0.08) vs GSCLX (0.00). GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSCLX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). GSCLX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.09 vs. GSCLX (-3.38). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. GSCLX (-15.31).
| GSCLX | RGACX | GSCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.94 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.490 | -2.542 | 373% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.38 | 3.09 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | 32.79 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.31 | 42.06 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.01 | 58.28 | 31% |