Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGACX
GSCLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. GSCLX (1.66B). GSCLX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: GSCLX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). GSCLX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 209.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: GSCLX (0) vs RGACX (250). GSCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. RGACX (7.94). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. GSCLX (-26.38).
| GSCLX | RGACX | GSCLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.93 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.93 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.480 | 6.185 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 7.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.90 | 43.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.38 | 13.23 | -199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.06 | 107.97 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement