Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSCLX vs RGAHX
GSCLX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GSCLX vs RGAHX
GSCLX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSCLX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSCLX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. GSCLX (1.62B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GSCLX: RGAHX (0.40) vs GSCLX (0.00). GSCLX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GSCLX (29 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). GSCLX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GSCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 209.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). GSCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: GSCLX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. GSCLX (-6.59). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. GSCLX (-33.91).
| GSCLX | RGAHX | GSCLX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.44 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.44 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.997 | 9.200 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.59 | 0.18 | -3,667% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.15 | 43.47 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.91 | 13.78 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.26 | 106.68 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement