Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSFTX vs RMEBX
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSFTX vs RMEBX
GSFTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSFTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSFTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSFTX (49.1B). GSFTX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GSFTX (1.46) vs RMEBX (0.99). GSFTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSFTX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GSFTX (0.65). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GSFTX (16.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSFTX: RMEBX (250) vs GSFTX (2000). GSFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.30 vs. RMEBX (9.03). GSFTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.46 vs. RMEBX (35.75).
| GSFTX | RMEBX | GSFTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.07 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.776 | 10.367 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.1B | 118B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.99 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.30 | 9.03 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.17 | 38.30 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.46 | 35.75 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.65 | 90.55 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers