Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGCX vs RMEBX
GSGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSGCX vs RMEBX
GSGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSGCX (473M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSGCX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GSGCX (0.37). GSGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSGCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GSGCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGCX: RMEBX (250) vs GSGCX (1000). GSGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.95 vs. RMEBX (7.37). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.55 vs. GSGCX (21.55).
| GSGCX | RMEBX | GSGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.07 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.977 | 9.484 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.99 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.95 | 7.37 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.34 | 36.25 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.55 | 33.55 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.95 | 88.62 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement