Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGRX vs RMEBX
GSGRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMEBX
GSGRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. GSGRX (446M). GSGRX (1.07) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSGRX (33 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GSGRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMEBX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). GSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. GSGRX (22.26).
| GSGRX | RMEBX | GSGRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.594 | 5.801 | 200% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.09 | 9.98 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.80 | 34.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.26 | 32.93 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.65 | 89.84 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement