Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGRX vs RMEBX
GSGRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMEBX
GSGRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSGRX (465M). RMEBX (0.99) and GSGRX (0.94) have matching dividends . GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSGRX (34 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GSGRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMEBX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). GSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.81 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. GSGRX (27.89).
| GSGRX | RMEBX | GSGRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.640 | 9.416 | 198% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 465M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 8.96 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.79 | 32.63 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.89 | 36.13 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.35 | 90.64 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers