Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGRX vs RMEBX
GSGRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMEBX
GSGRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GSGRX (462M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSGRX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GSGRX (0.93). GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSGRX (34 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GSGRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMEBX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). GSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. GSGRX (28.32).
| GSGRX | RMEBX | GSGRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.877 | 8.448 | 223% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.99 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.61 | 4.65 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 34.88 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.32 | 34.68 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.50 | 92.45 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers