Ad is loading...
GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income A
Price$43.95
Change+$0.27 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets375.17M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.01
Change+$0.55 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. GSGRX (375M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGRX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GSGRX (1.26). GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGRX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSGRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGRX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. GSGRX (-3.07). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.63 vs. GSGRX (39.68).
| GSGRX | RMFCX | GSGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.924 | -3.599 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 375M | 96.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.34 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.07 | 1.37 | -224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.32 | 7.19 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 50.63 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.34 | 51.64 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...