Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income A
Price$45.75
Change-$0.19 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets392.24M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$56.01
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.21B
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GSGRX (392M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGRX: RMFCX (1.37) vs GSGRX (1.30). GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGRX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSGRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGRX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.22 vs. GSGRX (-0.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.17 vs. GSGRX (45.82).
| GSGRX | RMFCX | GSGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.047 | 2.924 | 36% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 392M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.37 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.54 | 5.22 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.86 | 18.48 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.82 | 59.17 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.87 | 61.78 | 90% |