Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income A
Price$49.31
Change+$0.41 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets410.28M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.42
Change+$0.77 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.72B
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GSGRX (410M). RMFCX (1.20) and GSGRX (1.18) have matching dividends . GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGRX (33 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSGRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGRX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. GSGRX (-1.93). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.13 vs. GSGRX (39.15).
| GSGRX | RMFCX | GSGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.273 | 13.522 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 410M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.20 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | 5.50 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.98 | 42.73 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.15 | 57.13 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.60 | 90.63 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement