Ad is loading...
GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Equity Income A
Price$44.66
Change-$1.78 (-3.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.59M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.14
Change-$1.81 (-3.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GSGRX (401M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGRX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GSGRX (1.26). GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGRX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSGRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGRX (31.00) and RMFCX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. GSGRX (1.37). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.10 vs. GSGRX (63.53).
| GSGRX | RMFCX | GSGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.619 | 2.814 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.34 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 6.77 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.73 | 11.46 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.53 | 76.10 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.47 | 64.62 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...