Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GSGRX (462M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs GSGRX (0.93). GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGRX (34 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSGRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). GSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. GSGRX (28.32).
| GSGRX | RMFCX | GSGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.877 | 8.539 | 221% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.61 | 4.75 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 35.38 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.32 | 35.61 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.50 | 94.16 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers