Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGRX vs RMFCX
GSGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSGRX (474M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs GSGRX (0.94). GSGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGRX (34 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSGRX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSGRX: RMFCX (250) vs GSGRX (1000). GSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.62 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. GSGRX (29.36).
| GSGRX | RMFCX | GSGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.266 | 10.454 | 203% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.15 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.62 | 9.14 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.68 | 38.82 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.36 | 36.70 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.88 | 92.27 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers