Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSGSX vs RMFCX
GSGSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSGSX vs RMFCX
GSGSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSGSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSGSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSGSX (474M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSGSX: RMFCX (1.15) vs GSGSX (0.77). GSGSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSGSX (34 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSGSX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GSGSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). GSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.45 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. GSGSX (28.33).
| GSGSX | RMFCX | GSGSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.91 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.122 | 10.454 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.15 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.45 | 9.14 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.01 | 38.82 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.33 | 36.70 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.82 | 92.27 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement