Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$15.63
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets418.35M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.19
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.7B
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GSLAX (418M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMEBX (1.21) vs GSLAX (1.10). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSLAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMEBX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. GSLAX (-3.83). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.69 vs. GSLAX (32.27).
| GSLAX | RMEBX | GSLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.013 | 2.628 | -39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 418M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | 5.96 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.98 | 17.21 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.27 | 57.69 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.80 | 61.64 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement