Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets433.43M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GSLAX (433M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GSLAX (1.01). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMEBX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. GSLAX (-3.83). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. GSLAX (26.66).
| GSLAX | RMEBX | GSLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.333 | 12.681 | 50% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.09 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | 6.63 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.97 | 33.39 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.66 | 57.72 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.10 | 94.26 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers