Ad is loading...
GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$14.75
Change+$0.21 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.4M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. GSLAX (393M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMEBX (1.18) vs GSLAX (1.07). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSLAX (25 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMEBX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. GSLAX (-9.99). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. GSLAX (22.65).
| GSLAX | RMEBX | GSLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.916 | -2.724 | 291% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.18 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.99 | 1.74 | -574% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.82 | 5.82 | -134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.65 | 52.21 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.80 | 53.41 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...