Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets428.83M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. GSLAX (429M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GSLAX (1.06). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMEBX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. GSLAX (-1.00). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. GSLAX (35.37).
| GSLAX | RMEBX | GSLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.07 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.963 | 7.315 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 429M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.16 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.00 | 9.50 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.63 | 25.88 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.37 | 62.71 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.01 | 74.51 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement