Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMEBX
GSLAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSLAX (485M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GSLAX (0.61). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSLAX (27 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GSLAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMEBX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). GSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.13 vs. RMEBX (9.44). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.32 vs. GSLAX (11.06).
| GSLAX | RMEBX | GSLAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.07 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.295 | 10.825 | 206% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 485M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.99 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.13 | 9.44 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.91 | 38.42 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.06 | 36.32 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.20 | 91.39 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement