Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMFEX
GSLAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFEX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$16.38
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets427.44M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.00
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
GSLAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GSLAX (427M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFEX (1.51) vs GSLAX (1.03). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GSLAX (26 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFEX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. GSLAX (-0.55). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. GSLAX (24.83).
| GSLAX | RMFEX | GSLAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.737 | 10.078 | 37% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.51 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | 10.17 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.92 | 27.15 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.83 | 57.34 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.24 | 85.69 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement