Ad is loading...
GSLAX vs RMFEX
GSLAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFEX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A
Price$14.75
Change+$0.21 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.4M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
GSLAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. GSLAX (393M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFEX (1.61) vs GSLAX (1.07). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GSLAX (25 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GSLAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFEX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. GSLAX (-9.99). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.72 vs. GSLAX (22.65).
| GSLAX | RMFEX | GSLAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.62 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.916 | -2.593 | 305% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.61 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.99 | 2.21 | -451% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.82 | 7.26 | -108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.65 | 55.72 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.80 | 60.75 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...