Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSLAX vs RMFEX
GSLAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GSLAX vs RMFEX
GSLAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSLAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSLAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GSLAX (474M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GSLAX: RMFEX (1.41) vs GSLAX (0.61). GSLAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GSLAX (27 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). GSLAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSLAX: RMFEX (250) vs GSLAX (1000). GSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.04 vs. RMFEX (6.76). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.57 vs. GSLAX (10.34).
| GSLAX | RMFEX | GSLAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.62 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.62 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.705 | 8.622 | 252% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.41 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.04 | 6.76 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.07 | 36.79 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.34 | 37.57 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.68 | 101.71 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers