GSM
Price
$3.40
Change
+$0.08 (+2.41%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
632.52M
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LAC
Price
$3.06
Change
+$0.16 (+5.52%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GSM vs LAC

GSM vs LAC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GSM vs. LAC commentary
Jul 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSM is a Buy and LAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2026
Stock price -- (GSM: $3.32 vs. LAC: $2.90)
Brand notoriety: GSM and LAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GSM: 53% vs. LAC: 74%
Market capitalization -- GSM: $620.38M vs. LAC: $1.01B
GSM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $620.38M. LAC’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GSM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GSM and LAC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSM is a better buy in the short-term than LAC.

Price Growth

GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.61% price change this week, while LAC (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -7.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -4.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-4.15% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAC($1.07B) has a higher market cap than GSM($633M). GSM YTD gains are higher at: -27.883 vs. LAC (-33.486). GSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -17.2M vs. LAC (-56.29M). GSM has less debt than LAC: GSM (240M) vs LAC (875M). GSM has higher revenues than LAC: GSM (1.38B) vs LAC (0).
GSMLACGSM / LAC
Capitalization633M1.07B59%
EBITDA-17.2M-56.29M31%
Gain YTD-27.883-33.48683%
P/E Ratio6.34N/A-
Revenue1.38B0-
Total CashN/A759M-
Total Debt240M875M27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GSM vs LAC: Fundamental Ratings
GSM
LAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7888
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
407

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSM's Valuation (14) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LAC (37) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

LAC's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as GSM (97) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that LAC’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Price Growth Rating (78) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LAC (88) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as LAC (100) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to LAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSMLAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMIAX29.11N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
NSOIX19.87N/A
N/A
North Star Opportunity I
JEEDX19.79N/A
N/A
JHancock Infrastructure R6
RIDGX27.52-0.13
-0.47%
American Funds Income Fd of Amer R-6
JIGFX63.31-0.32
-0.50%
Janus Henderson Overseas I

GSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSM has been loosely correlated with FNUC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSM jumps, then FNUC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSM
1D Price
Change %
GSM100%
-0.90%
FNUC - GSM
36%
Loosely correlated
+7.41%
TMC - GSM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
SLI - GSM
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.87%
LZM - GSM
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
LAC - GSM
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
More

LAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with SLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then SLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAC
1D Price
Change %
LAC100%
-1.69%
SLI - LAC
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.87%
LAR - LAC
57%
Loosely correlated
-7.39%
NB - LAC
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MP - LAC
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
TMC - LAC
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More