Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSMIX vs NMBAX
GSMIX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts GSMIX vs NMBAX
GSMIX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSMIX vs. NMBAX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSMIX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSMIX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. NMBAX (9.46B). NMBAX (3.27) and GSMIX (3.23) have matching dividends . GSMIX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: GSMIX (33 years) vs NMBAX (31 years). GSMIX (0.74) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.64). GSMIX (24.00) and NMBAX (24.00) have comparable annual turnover. GSMIX initial investment is less costly to investors than NMBAX (3%) vs NMBAX (3%). GSMIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: GSMIX (1000) vs NMBAX (2500). GSMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. NMBAX (3.63). GSMIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.54 vs. NMBAX (2.61).
| GSMIX | NMBAX | GSMIX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.64 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.64 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.980 | -0.181 | -542% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 9.46B | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 3.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 3.63 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.86 | 10.21 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.54 | 2.61 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.22 | 15.19 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement