Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$14.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.11
Change-$0.22 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. GSPCX (1.39B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.48) vs GSPCX (0.49). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. GSPCX (-8.90). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.20 vs. GSPCX (-0.42).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.699 | 7.001 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.48 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.90 | 8.26 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.48 | 28.25 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.42 | 53.20 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.45 | 70.69 | -43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement