Ad is loading...
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$12.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.62
Change-$0.17 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.07B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. GSPCX (1.25B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.54) vs GSPCX (0.53). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.99 vs. GSPCX (-16.87). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.37 vs. GSPCX (-1.01).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.643 | 0.547 | -666% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 186B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.54 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.87 | 1.99 | -847% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.69 | 17.60 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.01 | 55.37 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.16 | 58.57 | -63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...