Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$15.12
Change-$0.10 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.49
Change-$0.66 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.93B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. GSPCX (1.49B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.42) vs GSPCX (0.46). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.75 vs. GSPCX (-11.05). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.66 vs. GSPCX (-4.61).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.160 | 9.300 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.42 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.05 | 3.75 | -295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.25 | 42.87 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.61 | 49.66 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.38 | 79.04 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement