Ad is loading...
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core C
Price$12.17
Change+$0.21 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$59.09
Change+$1.02 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.84B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 176B vs. GSPCX (1.18B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.53) vs GSPCX (0.53). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.62 vs. GSPCX (-23.04). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.36 vs. GSPCX (-3.32).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.078 | -3.581 | 309% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 176B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.53 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.04 | -1.62 | 1,422% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.36 | 5.35 | -380% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.32 | 54.36 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.45 | 52.10 | -81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...