Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$15.11
Change+$0.07 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. GSPCX (1.47B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs GSPCX (0.45). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. GSPCX (-13.41). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. GSPCX (-8.18).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.822 | 8.905 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.41 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.41 | 4.59 | -292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.89 | 29.92 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.18 | 45.02 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.15 | 72.75 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement