Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity C
Price$13.65
Change-$0.19 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$61.95
Change-$0.64 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.44B
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 194B vs. GSPCX (1.31B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.47) vs GSPCX (0.51). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). GSPCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMFX (31.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. GSPCX (-14.41). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.87 vs. GSPCX (0.04).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.31 | 606% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.487 | 1.465 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 194B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.47 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.41 | 4.65 | -310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.59 | 24.78 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.04 | 51.87 | 0% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.20 | 61.07 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement