Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. GSPCX (1.58B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.44) vs GSPCX (0.00). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (29 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. GSPCX (-10.90). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. GSPCX (-31.96).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.31 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.257 | 3.858 | 292% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 219B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.90 | 5.76 | -189% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.85 | 29.17 | -20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.96 | 28.02 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.42 | 77.65 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers