Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPCX vs RWMFX
GSPCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPCX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSPCX (1.56B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs GSPCX (0.00). GSPCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPCX (29 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPCX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPCX (1000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. GSPCX (-15.99). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. GSPCX (-34.32).
| GSPCX | RWMFX | GSPCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.31 | 565% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.31 | 610% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.908 | 4.508 | 242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.99 | 2.09 | -767% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.96 | 30.24 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.32 | 27.39 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.77 | 82.36 | -36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement