Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPFX vs RWMFX
GSPFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPFX vs RWMFX
GSPFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. GSPFX (26.9M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPFX: RWMFX (1.44) vs GSPFX (0.48). GSPFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPFX (10 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 176.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPFX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPFX (5000). GSPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.70 vs. RWMFX (5.76). GSPFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.15 vs. RWMFX (28.02).
| GSPFX | RWMFX | GSPFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.31 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.31 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.176 | 3.858 | 316% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.44 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.70 | 5.76 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.66 | 29.17 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.15 | 28.02 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement