Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPFX vs RWMFX
GSPFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPFX vs RWMFX
GSPFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPFX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. GSPFX (27M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs GSPFX (0.47). GSPFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPFX (9 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 176.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPFX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPFX (5000). GSPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.84 vs. RWMFX (8.10). GSPFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.57 vs. RWMFX (26.71).
| GSPFX | RWMFX | GSPFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.31 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.31 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.335 | 5.575 | 221% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27M | 214B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.40 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.84 | 8.10 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.02 | 33.11 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.57 | 26.71 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement