Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPIX vs RWMFX
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPIX vs RWMFX
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSPIX (1.51B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPIX: RWMFX (1.40) vs GSPIX (0.21). GSPIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPIX (29 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPIX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPIX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPIX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. GSPIX (9.55). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. GSPIX (23.13).
| GSPIX | RWMFX | GSPIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.31 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.554 | 5.436 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.40 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 11.16 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.63 | 31.31 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.13 | 26.42 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.18 | 85.87 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers