Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPIX vs RWMFX
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPIX vs RWMFX
GSPIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPIX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSPIX (1.56B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPIX: RWMFX (1.44) vs GSPIX (0.21). GSPIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPIX (29 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPIX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSPIX: RWMFX (250) vs GSPIX (1000000). GSPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. RWMFX (5.98). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.61 vs. GSPIX (24.03).
| GSPIX | RWMFX | GSPIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.31 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.725 | 4.152 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.44 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 5.98 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.11 | 32.83 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.03 | 28.61 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.30 | 80.52 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement