Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSPSX vs RWMFX
GSPSX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSPSX vs RWMFX
GSPSX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSPSX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSPSX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. GSPSX (1.58B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSPSX: RWMFX (1.40) vs GSPSX (0.00). GSPSX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSPSX (29 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSPSX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSPSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GSPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GSPSX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GSPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. GSPSX (15.50).
| GSPSX | RWMFX | GSPSX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.31 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.31 | 413% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.023 | 5.575 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.83 | 8.10 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.32 | 33.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.50 | 26.71 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.18 | 85.42 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement