Ad is loading...
GSSC vs SMMD
GSSC vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts GSSC vs SMMD
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
Price$61.33
Change+$1.10 (+1.83%)
Volume$100
Net Assets488.39M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$60.94
Change+$1.26 (+2.11%)
Volume$850
Net Assets1.29B
GSSC vs SMMD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSSC vs. SMMD commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSSC is a StrongBuy and SMMD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.29B vs. GSSC (488M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than GSSC: SMMD (-9.995) vs GSSC (-10.887). GSSC was incepted earlier than SMMD: GSSC (8 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GSSC (0.20). GSSC has a higher turnover SMMD (9.00) vs SMMD (9.00).
| GSSC | SMMD | GSSC / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | -10.887 | -9.995 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 488M | 1.29B | 38% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.15 | 133% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 9.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 1.42 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GSSC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GSSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSSC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSSC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSSC | 100% | +2.01% | ||
| UFPI - GSSC | 82% Closely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| BCC - GSSC | 71% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| GMS - GSSC | 67% Closely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| ATKR - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.03% | ||
| SSD - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +2.25% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.11% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +9.96% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.14% | ||
More | ||||