Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSURX vs RWMFX
GSURX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSURX vs RWMFX
GSURX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSURX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSURX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. GSURX (1.17B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSURX: RWMFX (1.40) vs GSURX (0.06). GSURX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSURX (19 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSURX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 204.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GSURX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GSURX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. GSURX (4.27).
| GSURX | RWMFX | GSURX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.31 | 390% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.450 | 5.575 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 214B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.40 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 8.10 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.13 | 33.11 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.27 | 26.71 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.57 | 85.42 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement