Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSURX vs RWMFX
GSURX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts GSURX vs RWMFX
GSURX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSURX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSURX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GSURX (1.13B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than GSURX: RWMFX (1.40) vs GSURX (0.06). GSURX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: GSURX (19 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). GSURX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). GSURX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 204.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). GSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: GSURX (0) vs RWMFX (250). GSURX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. GSURX (1.57).
| GSURX | RWMFX | GSURX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.31 | 377% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.31 | 390% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.940 | 1.322 | 525% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.40 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.09 | 7.03 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.20 | 30.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.57 | 26.38 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.39 | 82.33 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement