Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMEBX
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMEBX
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSVCX (473M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs GSVCX (0.00). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSVCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GSVCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMEBX (8.70) and GSVCX (8.44) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.43 vs. GSVCX (1.39).
| GSVCX | RMEBX | GSVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.07 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.345 | 9.399 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 8.70 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | 35.78 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.39 | 36.43 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.61 | 90.72 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement