Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMEBX
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMEBX
GSVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GSVCX (466M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs GSVCX (0.00). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GSVCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GSVCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). GSVCX (10.37) and RMEBX (10.26) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. GSVCX (2.62).
| GSVCX | RMEBX | GSVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.07 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.612 | 6.614 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 466M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 10.26 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.57 | 29.20 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.62 | 37.34 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.77 | 91.84 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement