Ad is loading...
GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C
Price$13.58
Change+$0.19 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.4M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. GSVCX (393M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMFCX (1.34) vs GSVCX (0.32). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVCX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSVCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. GSVCX (-11.43). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. GSVCX (15.81).
| GSVCX | RMFCX | GSVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.036 | -2.681 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.34 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.43 | 1.87 | -610% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.48 | 6.27 | -183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.81 | 53.32 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.15 | 54.78 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...