Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C
Price$14.76
Change+$0.14 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets424.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GSVCX (425M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMFCX (1.31) vs GSVCX (0.32). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVCX (25 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSVCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. GSVCX (-3.67). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. GSVCX (14.31).
| GSVCX | RMFCX | GSVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.412 | 5.919 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 425M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.67 | 9.01 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.48 | 17.82 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.31 | 51.66 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.02 | 70.47 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement