Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value C
Price$15.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.6M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.29
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GSVCX (431M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMFCX (1.27) vs GSVCX (0.31). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVCX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GSVCX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. GSVCX (-4.92). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.75 vs. GSVCX (20.20).
| GSVCX | RMFCX | GSVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.91 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.885 | 9.283 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.27 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.92 | 7.82 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.93 | 30.38 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.20 | 56.75 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.03 | 75.64 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement