Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSVCX (481M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMFCX (1.15) vs GSVCX (0.00). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVCX (27 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSVCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). GSVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.64 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. GSVCX (2.42).
| GSVCX | RMFCX | GSVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.91 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.151 | 10.454 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 481M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.64 | 9.14 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.76 | 38.82 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.42 | 36.70 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.67 | 92.27 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers