Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GSVCX (473M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GSVCX (0.00). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVCX (27 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSVCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). RMFCX (8.82) and GSVCX (8.44) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.36 vs. GSVCX (1.39).
| GSVCX | RMFCX | GSVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.91 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.345 | 9.462 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 8.82 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.30 | 36.31 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.39 | 37.36 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.61 | 92.46 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement