Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVCX vs RMFCX
GSVCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSVCX (474M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVCX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GSVCX (0.00). GSVCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVCX (27 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSVCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSVCX: RMFCX (250) vs GSVCX (1000). GSVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. GSVCX (1.02).
| GSVCX | RMFCX | GSVCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.91 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.91 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.137 | 9.496 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 9.09 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.94 | 33.16 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.02 | 37.08 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.91 | 92.36 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement