Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVRX vs RMFCX
GSVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVRX vs RMFCX
GSVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GSVRX (470M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVRX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GSVRX (0.42). GSVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSVRX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GSVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GSVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). GSVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.49 vs. RMFCX (7.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.18 vs. GSVRX (5.13).
| GSVRX | RMFCX | GSVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.91 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.213 | 8.607 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.16 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | 7.00 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.04 | 31.37 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.13 | 36.18 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.23 | 90.23 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement