Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVRX vs RMFCX
GSVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVRX vs RMFCX
GSVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GSVRX (457M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVRX: RMFCX (1.19) vs GSVRX (0.43). GSVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSVRX (1.49) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GSVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GSVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. GSVRX (7.60). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.61 vs. GSVRX (0.93).
| GSVRX | RMFCX | GSVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.91 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.91 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.089 | 6.016 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 457M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.19 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | 9.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.37 | 34.42 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.93 | 33.61 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.24 | 91.34 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement