Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GSVSX vs RMFCX
GSVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GSVSX vs RMFCX
GSVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GSVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GSVSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GSVSX (474M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GSVSX: RMFCX (1.15) vs GSVSX (0.46). GSVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GSVSX (27 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GSVSX (1.38) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GSVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GSVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GSVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). GSVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.86 vs. RMFCX (6.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.44 vs. GSVSX (9.16).
| GSVSX | RMFCX | GSVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.38 | 0.91 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.778 | 8.402 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 474M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.15 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.86 | 6.41 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.30 | 35.52 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.16 | 35.44 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.18 | 93.54 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement