GT
Price
$9.35
Change
+$0.09 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.9B
15 days until earnings call
MNRO
Price
$21.67
Change
-$0.24 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
915.6M
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GT vs MNRO

Header iconGT vs MNRO Comparison
Open Charts GT vs MNROBanner chart's image
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$9.35
Change+$0.09 (+0.97%)
Volume$26.63K
Capitalization3.9B
Monro
Price$21.67
Change-$0.24 (-1.10%)
Volume$7.89K
Capitalization915.6M
GT vs MNRO Comparison Chart
Loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GT vs. MNRO commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a StrongBuy and MNRO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GT: $9.26 vs. MNRO: $21.91)
Brand notoriety: GT: Notable vs. MNRO: Not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GT: 112% vs. MNRO: 142%
Market capitalization -- GT: $3.9B vs. MNRO: $915.6M
GT [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.9B. MNRO’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $915.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the long-term than MNRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNRO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNRO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than MNRO.

Price Growth

GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

GT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

MNRO is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.82% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GT($3.9B) has a higher market cap than MNRO($916M). GT has higher P/E ratio than MNRO: GT (769.23) vs MNRO (28.35). GT YTD gains are higher at: 2.889 vs. MNRO (-11.653). GT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 856M vs. MNRO (141M). GT has more cash in the bank: 902M vs. MNRO (23.8M). MNRO has less debt than GT: MNRO (616M) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than MNRO: GT (20.1B) vs MNRO (1.28B).
GTMNROGT / MNRO
Capitalization3.9B916M426%
EBITDA856M141M607%
Gain YTD2.889-11.653-25%
P/E Ratio769.2328.352,713%
Revenue20.1B1.28B1,573%
Total Cash902M23.8M3,790%
Total Debt8.65B616M1,404%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GT vs MNRO: Fundamental Ratings
GT
MNRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5884
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
177
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRO's Valuation (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for GT (98) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew significantly faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

MNRO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

MNRO's SMR Rating (85) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GT (92) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as MNRO (84) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

GT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNRO (77) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that GT’s stock grew significantly faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GTMNRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
85%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRSGX41.350.66
+1.62%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth A
CETAX12.110.17
+1.42%
Centerstone Investors A
RGAGX77.980.90
+1.17%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
ABECX20.880.14
+0.68%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq C
GMAYX24.50N/A
N/A
GMO Small Cap Quality I

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
-1.28%
VC - GT
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
MGA - GT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BWA - GT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
DAN - GT
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.42%
AXL - GT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More