Advertisement
GT vs MNRO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GT is a Hold and MNRO is a StrongBuy.
GT's RSI Indicator ascends from oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for GT moved out of oversold territory on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 30 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 26 of the 30 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 87%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 44 of 59 cases where GT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GT just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where GT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
Following a +4.48% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GT advanced for three days, in 194 of 274 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
GT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
The Aroon Indicator for GT entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 27 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.433) is normal, around the industry mean (0.876). P/E Ratio (-0.482) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.859). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.270) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.150) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.084) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. GT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. GT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
MNRO sees MACD Histogram just turned negative
MNRO saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 23, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 41 of the 48 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 85%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 43 of 61 cases where MNRO's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MNRO as a result. In 71 of 96 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MNRO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
MNRO broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
MNRO moved above its 50-day moving average on September 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for MNRO crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 15 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +5.13% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MNRO advanced for three days, in 175 of 274 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 112 of 171 cases where MNRO Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 65%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MNRO’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 89 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.710) is normal, around the industry mean (0.876). P/E Ratio (57.522) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.859). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (4.702) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.085) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.320) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MNRO’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.
GT | MNRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GT's Valuation (27) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRO (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that GT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.
GT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as MNRO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to MNRO’s over the last 12 months.
MNRO's SMR Rating (89) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GT (98) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.
MNRO's Price Growth Rating (71) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GT (84) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.
MNRO's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GT (97) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.
| GT | MNRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MNRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNRO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- MNRO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.58% price change this week, while MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
GT is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
MNRO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.01% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
Advertisement
GT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
MNRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNRO | 100% | -6.70% | ||
| ALV - MNRO | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| GT - MNRO | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
| LEA - MNRO | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| SMP - MNRO | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| DORM - MNRO | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||